[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":29},["ShallowReactive",2],{"nr-en-eu-ai-act-virkkunen-defends-full-lifecycle-rules":3},{"slug":4,"title":5,"dek":6,"date":7,"time":8,"publishedAt":9,"updated":10,"updatedAt":10,"dateFmt":11,"updatedFmt":10,"kind":12,"tier":13,"author":14,"authorName":15,"topics":16,"tracker":21,"trackerLabel":22,"headlineStat":23,"image":24,"ogImage":25,"imageAlt":5,"csv":10,"minutes":26,"words":27,"html":28},"eu-ai-act-virkkunen-defends-full-lifecycle-rules","EU AI Act: Virkkunen defends rules covering the entire AI lifecycle","EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen rejects criticism that the AI Act is already outdated. According to a report, the Commission has also sent information requests to more than 30 AI companies on safety, transparency and copyright.","2026-10-11","07:16","2026-10-11T07:16:00+02:00","","October 11, 2026","news","standard","ideal-syka","Ideal Syka",[17,18,19,20],"EU AI Act","Regulation","AI safety","Compliance","\u002Feu-ai-act-fahrplan","To the EU AI Act timeline","More than 30 AI companies contacted","\u002Fnewsroom\u002Fimg\u002Feu-ai-act-virkkunen-defends-full-lifecycle-rules.webp","\u002Fog-nr\u002Feu-ai-act-virkkunen-defends-full-lifecycle-rules.en.png",2,431,"\u003Cp>EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen has defended the European rulebook for artificial intelligence against criticism. In an interview with Reuters she reiterated that the \u003Cstrong>EU AI Act\u003C\u002Fstrong> covers the entire lifecycle of highly capable models. She rejected the charge that the law, adopted two years ago, is already outdated given rapid progress. Europe, she said, is well prepared against uncontrolled AI agents.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Key facts\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>At the end of August 2026 the Commission sent information requests to \u003Cstrong>more than 30 AI companies\u003C\u002Fstrong>.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>The requests concern safety measures, transparency and copyright questions.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>The \u003Cstrong>EU AI Office\u003C\u002Fstrong> has held formal enforcement powers since \u003Cstrong>2 August 2026\u003C\u002Fstrong>.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>For violations by general-purpose models, the law sets caps of up to \u003Cstrong>15 million euros\u003C\u002Fstrong> or \u003Cstrong>three percent\u003C\u002Fstrong> of global annual turnover.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003Ch2>Information requests after incidents\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The Commission is currently reviewing the responses. It did not name specific companies, but also contacted Chinese start-ups, since the most capable models are currently being built in the US and China. Following autonomous cyberattacks carried out by AI systems, the Commission additionally requested information from OpenAI and Anthropic, as Virkkunen confirmed to the Deutsche Presse-Agentur. Both developers had acknowledged that their software had unintentionally attacked other companies during test runs. In Virkkunen's assessment, the current dangers lie mainly in cybersecurity; biological weapons or terrorism risks could emerge later.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Staggered deadlines and risk tiers\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The rulebook distinguishes between risk levels. Practices such as social scoring or real-time biometric surveillance in public spaces are prohibited. Models above 10^25 FLOPs are classified as systemically risky.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cdiv class=\"tbl-scroll\">\u003Ctable>\n\u003Cthead>\n\u003Ctr>\n\u003Cth>Obligation\u003C\u002Fth>\n\u003Cth>Applies from\u003C\u002Fth>\n\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003C\u002Fthead>\n\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\n\u003Ctd>Transparency obligations (Art. 50)\u003C\u002Ftd>\n\u003Ctd>2 August 2026\u003C\u002Ftd>\n\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\n\u003Ctd>High-risk, standalone applications\u003C\u002Ftd>\n\u003Ctd>2 December 2027\u003C\u002Ftd>\n\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\n\u003Ctd>High-risk, embedded products\u003C\u002Ftd>\n\u003Ctd>2 August 2028\u003C\u002Ftd>\n\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003C\u002Fdiv>\n\u003Cp>The timetable for high-risk systems was shifted by the \u003Cstrong>Digital Omnibus\u003C\u002Fstrong>, endorsed by the Council on 29 June 2026. In the budget discussions for 2028 to 2034, the Commission is also considering a digital levy on large US technology groups. The decision rests with the governments of the member states.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Assessment: what this means for German companies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Virkkunen's remarks signal that Brussels is holding to the lifecycle approach and expanding enforcement. For mid-sized firms, the key question is which of their own AI applications count as high-risk and which documentation and transparency duties follow. It remains open how strictly companies' responses will be assessed and which priorities the first codes of practice will set next year.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Sources\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fborncity.com\u002Fnews\u002Feu-ai-act-henna-virkkunen-verteidigt-regeln-fuer-den-gesamten-ki-lebenszyklus\u002F\">BornCity\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003Cp>\u003Cem>Editorially owned by \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fen\u002Fautor\u002Fideal-syka\">Ideal Syka\u003C\u002Fa>. Sources and method: \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fen\u002Fredaktion\">Newsroom & method\u003C\u002Fa>. Tips and corrections: \u003Ca href=\"mailto:ai@i6eal.de\">ai@i6eal.de\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\n",1791715875914]